In article <3c77af60_5@corp-goliath.newsgroups.com>,

 "Mulchboy" <Melchizedek@tabernacle.com> wrote:

 

> There is nothing inside, it is merely just an empty shell."

 

Yes, we know that your skull was hollowed out by a Great Old One 3.2

years ago.

 

> Here is a general impression of atheism on the usenet and world wide web.

 

That would be *your* impression, Mulchy - not the impression of USENET

or the rest of the 'net.

 

>  I guess it may be different in the real world (probably not) but who knows.

>  The vast majority of atheists that post on this newsgroup and on the web

>  share the following characteristics:

>

>    1.) Hatred and obsession with Christianity.

 

Projection.  In your case, a form of projectile diarrhea.

Atheists, are not "obsessed", we arenÕt even an organized group.  But

we get annoyed with all of the brainless fuckwit theists that post here,

almost all of who seem to xtian of one sort or another.

 

This has been explained to you, what... over a dozen times now?

 

> It is sooo ironic that

>  atheists are obsessed with Christianity, trying to always prove it wrong and

>  hating it.

 

Yeah, right.  The burden of proof is on the claimant, Mulchy.

 

> I have a degree in psychology.

 

Suuure you do.  From Bob Jones University, no doubt.

 

> Hate is an emotion that stems from

>  fear and fear leads to aggression. People fear what they do not understand

>  and what they jealous of.

 

Fear = jealousy?

No wonder you're so fucked up.

 

> Every atheist website I have encounted as

>  demonstrated hate against the Christian religion and other religions, too.

 

Translation: "Waaaaaah!!!!  They're *picking* on my beliefs! 

Waaaahhh!!!"

 

>  There is no reason to fear Christians.

 

Unless you are gay/bi/trans, or a doctor who performs abortions, or

Jewish, or Muslim, or are an altar boy, or in the way of "Manifest

Destiny" or...

 

> Now, the obsession part refers to how

>  atheists incessantly try to prove Jesus and Christianty as a scam.

 

No, the scam artists try to prove that there is substance to their

pronouncements.

 

> Here

>  again, the atheist's fear and hatred of the Christian religion is present.

>  Otherwise Jesus wouldn't even be a topic.

 

Mulchy, have you ever considered actuually reading the newsgroup, or the

responses that you generate?

How many times does it need to be said?

We wouldn't be discussing it if the shitenugget christies werenÕt

pestering us all the time.

 

> This also shows insecurity.

 

Yes, it certainly does.  You christies are do insecure in your inane

beliefs hat you only feel comfortable with a horde of fanatics around

you.

 

>If

>  atheists were secure about their atheism, who cares what theists do?

 

Aside from killing people in the name of their religion?  And attempting

to legislate their own twisted "morality"?  And BOTHERING PEOPLE WHO

DON'T WANT TO TALK TO THEM?

 

> Hey

>  don't take my word that atheists are insecure.

 

I won't.

 

> Again, just read any atheist

>  website or a magazine like the Skeptical Review. Atheism hardly gets

>  mentioned. Instead, it's always about "Hey let's talk about Christianity and

>  how much it sucks".

>

>    2.) Total intolerance to Christianity. Atheists have zero tolerance for

>  theist beliefs and readily claim to, "Read the Bible just to prove it

>  wrong". Well, this really is a sign of insecurity in their atheism. Heck,

>  atheists might as well call themselves Christians based on the time they

>  spend reading the Bible!

 

You're repeating yourself, Mulchboy.

 

>    3.) Vulgarity. Whew! Talk about filthy mouths! Reading an atheist

>  newsgroup is like watching Def Comedy Jam  with the profanity muiltiplied

>  10,000 times. If I had a nicklel for everytime an atheist cursed on the

>  usenet......ha ha.

 

Gets your dick hard, doesn't it?  C'mon - you can admit it here - we

*all* know that the only reason you post this shit you ripped from your

momma's ass is that you yank your crank to the well-deserved stompings

you get afterward.

 

It's allright - your kink is o.k.

 

> I have never seen any group of people use such constant

>  filthy language in debates as atheists do. Atheists are perfectly nice to

>  people that think and look exactly like them but if you are a theist, watch

>  out! Prepare to be called an infinite number of names. This is trutly a sign

>  of low intelligence. From a psychological opinion this again suggest

>  insecurity and fear. This also suggest anger which is a very wasted emotion.

>  I think as mature and educated adults (some of us) we should be bigger than

>  resorting to name calling and treat each other with respect. Sigh...Of

>  course that is just my opinion in promoting an intellectual and mature

>  enviroment. Even if I was an atheist, I really couldn't hang around such a

>  filthy mouthed  and mean people.

>

>    3.)

 

Um, did you forget how to count *already*?

 

> A very immature outlook on sex. Yes, atheists follow a very immature

>  view on sex. They readily make 4th grade jokes about sex and act as if they

>  are still virgins, never having actually had sex but only reading about it

>  porn magazines. Many of the jokes made on atheist newsgroups involve sex and

>  cussing. But I am of the opinion that a truly talented comedian does not

>  have to use childish sexual innuendos or slander certain groups of people.

 

Oh my. I guess that the lovely time time my wife & I had this morning

wasnÕt actually "sex", despite the penetration and orgasms.  Oh well -

whatever it was it was a lot of fun.

 

>     4.) Constantly claiming Albert Einstein as an atheist and only to put

>  their foot in their mouth! Einstein was not an atheist. He was a Unitarian.

 

He was a Jewish deist.  He was never a member of any Unitarian

congregation.

Not that it would matter, as Unitarians are *not by any means* Christian.

 

>  It is true that he did not believe in the Christian God but he believed in a

>  higher being, nonetheless. I don't know what else to say other than try

>  actually reading what he wrote.

 

I have; you have also, but apparently aren't aware of the subtleties of

context.

 

>        In conclusion, I think atheism has a long way to go before it deserves

>  respect. Respect is something that is earned.

 

Why on earth would I want or need the respect of a wad of festering,

rotting, stench-filled mulch?